Stephen Badylak on “Regenerative Medicine: Possibilities and Potential” at Singularity Summit 2011

Dr. Stephen Badylak  is a professor of surgery at the University of Pittsburgh, and he’s the deputy director of the McGowan  institute for regenerative medicine. He began his career at Purdue University in 1983, and has practiced both veterinary and human medicine. Over the last 20 years, and initially in animals, Dr. Badylak has pioneered the medical application of tissue growth technology. He is  famous for r his work regrowing portions of esophagi, tendons, bladders, blood vessels, and even hearts. Dr. Badylak has earned 50 U.S. patents, 200 patents globally, and has authored more than 200 scientific publications.


This entry was posted in Blog, News. Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Stephen Badylak on “Regenerative Medicine: Possibilities and Potential” at Singularity Summit 2011

  1. 4gen_296 says:

    Good video!

  2. Luke says:

    Would love to see him on board with foregen!

    • Enzo says:

      It is going to be difficult ,all these important doctors want to be remembered in the history for regenerating hearts, livers, bladders, kidneys and so on………i am afraid he is one of those who considers foreskin almost useless

      • Kingsley says:

        It doesn’t matter if he is ignorant about the importance of the foreskin so long as others can make use of the technology he develops to help men who know.

  3. Tony says:

    Ok really? If they’ve regrown fully functional muscle and tendons in the quadricep, which is arguably one of the biggest muscles in the body, then regrowing a fully functional foreskin should be more of a reality than we all thought. I’m hearing muscle, hearts, esophagi, bladders have all been regrown over the years. What is stopping us from foreskin? If you ask me, a heart is way more complex than foreskin.

  4. UnstoppableJones says:

    darn foreskin haters

  5. David says:

    The question at the end of this video is not altogether encouraging for those of us in the US. This technology has quite a history, but the regulatory and political environment is a huge barrier. If they can’t even get esophagi and muscle tissue applications on the fast track, I fear foreskins will be very far in the future. I’m still thankful foregen is working on it. Perhaps it will be the wildcard.

    • Chris says:

      The technology already exists. The medical system is going to try to hold back technology like this for as long as possible. They don’t want healthy people. This is because they don’t make money from healthy people, they make money from sick people.

      Eventually people are going to realize that this technology is out there and they will demand to be treated with it, instead of allowing the system to keep them sick and alive for decades, making money the whole time.

    • Foregen says:

      USA is only a small fraction of the world,if we can’t make it here,we can always make it elsewhere

      • Chris says:

        I agree completely. If I have to go to China to regenerate I will. If I have to go to Brazil, Germany or any other country I will. The technology already exists and nobody can stop it.

      • Ryan says:

        I’d gladly go overseas to get treatment, even as a test subject. I don’t enjoy sex right now, and I’ll do whatever it takes as soon as someone says it’s ready.

        Has Foregen looked at other countries?

  6. forseti says:

    It’s at least encouraging to know that such progress is being made. As regeneration becomes less mysterious, our goal will become closer to realization.

  7. atfman says:

    I found a video of the December 15, 2011
    There’s it’s new and old.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLFUEEs2ouM

    With respect lives nearby.
    April 26 – 28,2012
    Symposium on Biologic Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine
    http://www.mirm.pitt.edu/events/2012_Meetings/2012scaffoldssymposium.asp

  8. Park says:

    I believe CHUV’s poposal..

  9. Jordan says:

    I just wish I could contribute more. Foregen is all about taking things into our own hands. If everybody gives what they can, at least we will have a fighting chance to make something happen.

    • Jordan says:

      Yeah I agree but we can only do so much before the government of our own countries gets involved. Thats not saying anything bad about them getting involved, it’s just that they take forever to do anything like this. The technology already exists but it isn’t being used for this right now so they might just put it aside for “Later”. Has anyone checked out http://www.indiegogo.com/ ? I’d like to hear what Foregen members and workers think about this option.

  10. Jordan says:

    I’ve got to ask and I hope a member of the Foregen staff will be able to help me out here, but is using a device like the TLC Tugger a good idea if I was to later get the procedure done? Would that cause any problems that we already can predict before hand? I would really like to know so I can make up my mind if it’s a good idea to beging restoring now or if I should wait until this procedure is available.

    • Chris says:

      I can only speak for myself, but personally I am currently restoring. I know that the technology to regenerate alredy exists, but I don’t have access to it right now. So I am doing the 2nd best thing which is restoring. I don’t see any reason why they can’t just remove the restored “foreskin” and replace it with a real, regenerated foreskin.

      • Jordan says:

        Good point, I guess it’s a good idea to try and restore until the procedure is available to the public then. Thanks alot :)

        • Anon says:

          wouldn’t the nerves in the shaft be less concentrated though?

          • Jordan says:

            That is another question I had but I guess it would be smart to just wait for these kind of answers. I’m sure someone at Foregen would have the answers, it would be cool if they had a kind of info tab that talked about the pros and cons of restoring vs. regeneration.

          • Chris says:

            I think the nerves in a restored “foreskin” may be less concentrated. But I think that all the restored tissue could be removed to make room for regeneration. Once new tissue is regenerated it should be the same as the original.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>